Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 29878

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : BC23 - BC26 Full Version

Pooled Sera as an Alternative to Commercial Internal Quality Control in Clinical Laboratories


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64088.18567
Anita Devi, Anjana Negi

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, DRPGMC, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, SLBSGMC, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Anita Devi,
Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Paraclinical Block, DRPGMC, Tanda, Kangra-176001, Himachal Pradesh, India.
E-mail: anitachand48@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Internal Quality Control (IQC) is run to assess the day-to-day performance of an analytical process, ensuring the reliability of patient results. However, commercial internal quality materials can be expensive and inaccessible for many laboratories. Therefore, there is a need for an effective and economical alternative to commercial IQC.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and stability of pooled sera as an IQC material.

Materials and Methods: A laboratory study was conducted over a period of 50 days, from January 10 to February 28, 2023, in the Department of Biochemistry at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College (DRPGMC), Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India. Serum samples (150 μL) were collected from 100 leftover samples over a span of 10 days. The serum was thoroughly mixed and distributed into 75 aliquots. Commercial IQC was also reconstituted and distributed into 75 aliquots. Both the commercial and pooled sera IQC were stored at -20°C. One aliquot of pooled sera was analysed daily for 16 routine biochemistry parameters, along with the commercial IQC, for the entire 50-day period. The results from both materials were interpreted using L-J chart and Westgard multirule. The stability of pooled sera for these routine parameters was assessed by comparing the mean values of the biochemical parameters on day 1 and day 50. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 software, and a paired t-test with a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The bias percentage for each pooled sera parameter was calculated and compared with the desirable bias for clinical significance.

Results: Analytical errors were observed during the study period for Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), urea, sodium, potassium, and chloride. The nature and number of analytical errors observed with both materials were the same, with Westgard rule 13s detecting random errors for ALP and rule 23s detecting systematic errors for urea and serum electrolytes (sodium, potassium, and chloride). Difference in the mean value of alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and bilirubin, on day 1 and day 50 was statistically significant with p-values 0.035, 0.04, and 0.024, respectively. When these parameters were assessed for clinical bias, they were found to be clinically insignificant.

Conclusion: Pooled serum is an effective and stable alternative IQC material for daily performance assessment of analytical processes. In-house IQC or pooled sera not only reduces the cost of quality control but also helps maintain continuity in the absence of commercial IQC, preventing any disruptions in the control system over an extended period.

Keywords

Alanine transaminase, Aspartate transaminase, Bilirubin, L-J charts, Pooled serum, Westgard rules

The quality of a clinical laboratory is assessed using different quality indicators at various phases of the total testing process, including the preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical levels (1),(2). Quality control material is utilised at the analytical level to reflect the variation occurring at that stage. In the laboratory, quality controls involve IQC and external quality control. IQC assesses the day-to-day intralaboratory variation (3), whereas external quality control evaluates interlaboratory variation (4) and is performed on a monthly basis. IQC plays a crucial role in monitoring laboratory variation and determining whether the observed variations are acceptable or not (5),(6). This information is vital in deciding whether to proceed with sample analysis and release the patient’s report, thereby avoiding incorrect reporting. IQC is performed by running quality control material that should be homogeneous, stable, non infectious, and affordable. Quality control materials available in the market can be either lyophilized or in liquid form, and they can be assayed or non-assayed. Commercial quality control materials can be derived from human or animal sources. However, the use of commercial quality control materials has certain drawbacks, such as lot-to-lot variation in concentration, reconstitution-related errors (e.g., temperature and solvent used), over dilution or under dilution, reconstitution duration, vigorous shaking, and light exposure (5),(6). While these issues associated with commercial IQC use are not unavoidable, some can be mitigated. Matrix-related variation can be minimised by using human-origin quality control material, and reconstitution-related errors can be minimised by using liquid quality control material. Additionally, the problem of lot variation can be mitigated by purchasing quality control material from the same lot for an extended period of time. Despite being effective, commercial IQC materials are expensive. In resource-limited developing countries, many laboratories find commercial IQC economically unviable due to its cost. In such cases, pooled sera can serve as an alternative to commercial IQC. Pooled serum is a homogenised mixture of human serum that can be easily prepared using leftover samples in any clinical laboratory. Pooled serum has a matrix closer to that of the patient and avoids reconstitution-related errors observed with lyophilised commercial IQC. While pooled serum is a cost-effective and economical alternative to commercial IQC, this should not come at the expense of compromising overall laboratory quality. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the effectiveness and stability of pooled sera as an alternative to commercial quality control material for various routine biochemical parameters. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and stability of pooled sera as an IQC material.

Material and Methods

A laboratory study as a quality control initiative was conducted in the Department of Biochemistry, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Medical College Kangra at Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India, after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) (no. IEC/036/2022). The study was conducted over a period of 50 days, from January 10 to February 28, 2023. Informed consent was obtained from the patients, and 100 leftover serum samples after routine biochemistry analysis were collected.

Inclusion criteria: Leftover serum samples negative for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HbsAg), and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Samples with significant haemolysis, lipemia, or icterus were excluded from the study.

Procedure

A 15 mL pooled serum was prepared by collecting 150 μL of leftover serum sample from 10 samples daily for 10 days and stored in a glass flask. After collecting the pooled sera, it was mixed and processed for homogenisation. Then, it was distributed into 75 aliquots, each containing a volume of 200 μL. No preservative was used. Commercial lyophilised IQC of ERBA NORM from ERBA Mannheim was reconstituted following the manufacturer’s recommended precautions and distributed into 75 aliquots, each containing 200 μL. Both the pooled sera and commercial IQC were stored at -20°C until further processing. One aliquot of pooled sera was processed daily for 50 days along with commercial IQC for 16 routine biochemical parameters (Glucose, urea, creatinine, bilirubin, ALT, AST, ALP, protein, albumin, cholesterol, triglyceride, calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium, and chloride) on a tranasia XL-640 analyser using standard reagents. The initial 20 days’ data were used to plot the L-J chart (7). The values of pooled sera and commercial IQC were entered in this chart on a daily basis for 30 days and interpreted using the Westgard multirule (Table/Fig 1) (8),(9). To assess the stability of pooled sera, 16 parameters were run in repeats of 10 on day 1 and day 50.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 software. The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation were calculated for both materials using the data from the initial 20 days of the study. These values were then used to plot an L-J chart, where the control value (mean±3SD) was plotted on the y-axis and the date/time was plotted on the x-axis. The results of each parameter on day one and day 50 were presented as mean±SD. The mean values of the 16 parameters on day one and day 50 were compared using a paired t-test, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. The bias percentage for each parameter was calculated using the formula (Bias %=D50 Mean-D1 mean/D1 mean×100) and compared with the desirable bias for each parameter to assess its clinical significance (10).

Results

The mean and Standard Deviation (SD) of the initial 20 days’ data were used to plot the L-J chart for pooled sera and commercial 24IQC (Table/Fig 2). The mean±SD of the pooled sera data for routine parameters were as follows: glucose (109.4±5.79 mg/dL), urea (30.1±1.44 mg/dL), creatinine (1.04±0.10 mg/dL), total bilirubin (1.46±0.07 mg/dL), AST (30.4±3.42 U/L), ALT (27.6±2.18 U/L), Albumin (4.0±0.25 g/dL), cholesterol (164±6.52 mg/dL), triglyceride (140±5.39 mg/dL), calcium (7.9±0.45 mg/dL), phosphorus (3.8±0.31 mg/dL), sodium (132.7±3.02 mmol/L), potassium (3.9±0.26 mmol/L), and chloride (113±5.39 mmol/L). The commercial IQC data for routine parameters were as follows: glucose (89.7±5.48 mg/dL), urea (39.7±1.37 mg/dL), creatinine (1.23±0.12 mg/dL), total bilirubin (1.05±0.07 mg/dL), AST (35.2±3.91 U/L), ALT (38.5±2.11 U/L), ALP (128.4±9.64 U/L), total protein (5.56±0.34 g/dL), albumin (3.5±0.26 g/dL), cholesterol (141.7±6.59 mg/dL), triglyceride (132±5.32 mg/dL), calcium (7.6±0.45 mg/dL), phosphorus (4.0±0.32 mg/dL), sodium (135.0±2.73 mmol/L), potassium (4.0±0.25 mmol/L), and chloride (105±5.20 mmol/L). The pooled sera data for ALP, Na, K, Cl, and urea violated the rules, with one value of ALP being +3SD on day 9, values for each serum electrolyte (Na, K, and Cl) being +2SD on day 14, and one value for urea being +2SD on day 18. These analytical errors were consistent with the observations from the commercial IQC. The Westgard within-run rule was used for the final data interpretation. Root cause analysis was performed for each analytical error, and appropriate corrective actions were taken (Table/Fig 3). The L-J chart for pooled serum and commercial IQC for serum electrolytes is provided in (Table/Fig 4). There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the mean value of most of the pooled sera parameters between day one and day 50, except for AST (p-value 0.04), ALT (p-value 0.035), and bilirubin (p-value 0.024), where a significant decrease was observed on day 50. However, when the difference in these three parameters was assessed for clinical bias, it was found to be insignificant (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The present study assessed the effectiveness and stability of pooled sera as an IQC material. The errors observed for pooled sera and commercial IQC were similar in number and nature, indicating that the efficiency of pooled sera IQC was comparable to that of a commercial IQC.

As both control materials were analysed for biochemical parameters in the same run, data were interpreted using the within-run Westgard multirule. A rejection rule of 13S, which is sensitive to random error, was observed for ALP on day 9. Upon cause analysis, it was found that the calibration for ALP was out of limit on that run due to insufficient calibration volume. Corrective action was taken by running calibration with a freshly prepared calibrator. A rejection rule of 23S, sensitive to systematic error, was observed for electrolytes (Na, K, and Cl) on day 14. An upward trend was also observed with electrolytes due to gradual deterioration of the reagent pack before day 14. Corrective action was taken by replacing it with a new reagent. Another rejection rule of 23S, sensitive to systematic error, was observed for urea on day 18. Reagent R2 of urea was found to be contaminated due to the mixing of two different lots of reagents. Corrective action was taken by replacing it with fresh reagent.

When the pooled serum was assessed for the stability of routine biochemical parameters over a period of 50 days at -20°C, it was found to be stable for almost all parameters under study except ALT, AST, and bilirubin. The decrease in the concentration of ALT and AST with time could be due to the loss of enzymatic activity as a result of prolonged storage. The decrease in the concentration of bilirubin could be due to its degradation during storage. Although the study observed a statistically significant change in the concentration of these parameters over the 50-day period, the change was found to be clinically insignificant. Similar results have been observed in other studies. For example, Kachhawa K et al., found most of the common biochemical parameters to be stable in serum following 30 days of storage at -20°C (11). Other studies have also found pooled sera to be better than commercial IQC. Kulkarni S et al., observed variation in the stability of enzymes like AST, ALT, and ALP in the commercial control material after 10 days of storage compared to the pooled serum, where enzymes were stable up to 30 days but the variation was not clinically significant (12).

Khatri R et al., observed that the reliability and validity of test reports were better with pooled sera compared to commercial QC (13). In this study, pooled sera were run for a period of two months, and it was found to be stable for most of the parameters. Studies have found that the shelf life of pooled sera can be increased by lyophilisation. Jamtsho R prepared homemade lyophilised human serum without a stabiliser, which was stable for atleast nine months when stored at -20°C and seven months at 2-8°C (3). However, this would require a lyophiliser and may give rise to reconstitution-related errors observed with lyophilised commercial IQC.

Limitation(s)

To prepare a pathological range covering higher values, the addition of analytes would be required. It was difficult to prepare pooled serum IQC covering all pathological ranges at a given point in time.

Conclusion

Pooled sera are comparable to commercial IQC in terms of their effectiveness and stability as an IQC.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to acknowledge the support of the technical staff in Department of Biochemistry, DRPGMC, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.

References

1.
Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Chiozza ML. Harmonization of pre-analytical quality indicators. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014;24(1):105-13. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem. 2010;47(Pt 2):101-10. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Jamtsho R. Stability of lyophilized human serum for use as quality control material in Bhutan. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2013;28(4):418-21.[crossref][PubMed]
4.
Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Zardo L, Plebani M. The role of the external quality assessment. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2010;20(2):160-64. [crossref]
5.
Badrick T. Quality leadership and quality control. Clin Biochem Rev. 2003;24(3):81-93.
6.
Badrick T. The quality control system. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008;29(Suppl 1):S67-70.
7.
Levey S, Jennings ER. The use of control charts in the clinical laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol. 1950;20(11):1059-66. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Westgard JO, Barry PL, Hunt MR, Groth T. A multi-rule Shewhart chart for quality control in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem. 1981;27(3):493-501. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Westgard JO, Groth T, Aronsson T, Falk H, deVerdier CH. Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: Probabilities for false rejection and error detection. Clin Chem. 1977;23(10):1857-67. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
[Accessed 2022, 25 th October] Desirable specifications for total Error, imprecision, and bias, derived from intra- and inter-individual biologic variation. https://www. westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm.
11.
Kachhawa K, Kachhawa P, Varma M, Behera R, Agrawal D, Kumar S. Study of the stability of various biochemical analytes in samples stored at different predefined storage conditions at an accredited laboratory of India. J Lab Physicians. 2017;9(1):11-15. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kulkarni S, Pierre SA, Kaliaperumal R. Efficacy of pooled serum internal quality control in comparison with commercial internal quality control in clinical biochemistry laboratory. J Lab Physicians. 2020;12(3):191-95. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Khatri R, Sanjay KC, Shrestha P, Sinha JN. Implementing self-sustained quality control procedures in a clinical laboratory. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2013;52(189):233-37.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64088.18567

Date of Submission: Mar 15, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 03, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Aug 08, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 18, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 23, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 05, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com